A Moderate View of the Republican Debate

rep-vs-rep

Republicans held their eighth nationally televised debate on ABC last night, making their final pleas to voters in New Hampshire and vying for limited space on a crowded stage. Admittedly, I’ve been neglecting the political right for most of the primary season. As a Moderate, it’s been difficult to pay attention. When Donald Trump is sucking up all the oxygen, I tend to tune out.

In the interest of fairness, and the spirit of this blog, I instead tuned in. Here’s what I learned:

The Republicans think they’re running against Obama.

It’s an obvious strategy. Run against an unpopular administration and hope the president’s unfavorable ratings carry you to an electoral win in November. Obama’s name was brought up over a dozen times. Clinton and Sanders received little attention.

The most focused attack on the president came from Rubio. His ostensibly prepared remarks about the president’s, “systematic effort to change America,” were premised on the proposition that, “President Obama knows what he’s doing.” It became a rallying cry for attacks on the young candidate for the rest of the night. Christie accused Rubio of reciting, “a memorized 25 second speech,” and Rubio responded oddly enough, by making a thirty second speech. The other candidates followed up by twisting the line to suggest Rubio supports the president’s policies.

Again, this is what we’d expect in a Republican primary, but it’s a short-sighted approach that could end up costing the Republicans in November. The newest jobs numbers released Friday show unemployment sinking to its lowest numbers since 2008. If the Republicans stay negative about a positive economy, it could strengthen the idea that they’ve lost touch with reality. It would serve them better to start running against the Democratic candidates’ vision for the future.

There’s room for common ground.

Unless, we’re talking about Donald Trump’s promise to bring back waterboarding and, “bring back a hell of a lot worse,” the extremes were kept to a minimum.

There are actually a few places where the two parties can come together, particularly on immigration. Kasich and Rubio are putting forward some serious ideas about solving the problem of immigrants without legal status already living in America. Rubio believes that, “the way forward is with the American people.” He says that enforcing immigration law is crucial to building support for a path to citizenship. Kasich eschews citizenship, but is supporting a guest worker program as a “path to legalization.” Ted Cruz, regardless of his insistence on a wall, has better ideas about using technology to enforce our current immigration laws.

On social issues from the past 50 years the distinction between Republicans and Democrats remains sharp. However, current issues have softened the lines. Trump aside, Republican candidates are taking a positive tone with Muslim-Americans. Rubio called for, “strong, positive relationships with Muslims in America,” with Christie agreeing on the need for cooperation. John Kasich promoted the need for minority entrepreneurship, protections for the disabled, and “collaboratives” between police and disadvantaged communities.

All of the candidates agreed that women serving in combat roles in the military was a positive development, and supported opening the selective service to women for the purposes of equality. Veteran’s care opened a discussion on health care, and Rubio proposed letting veterans, “take their benefits to any doctor and any hospital.”

These aren’t entirely groundbreaking ideas, but it does cut into the narrative that Republicans are unfeeling, backwards thinking Neanderthals that only want to bomb Muslims and persecute minorities and women. It’s not perfect, but these are great starting points for discussion.

Seven candidates are better than two.

Put a sizable number of strong personalities on any stage and tension is bound to unravel. The Republican candidates couldn’t even agree on their introductions. Donald Trump and Ben Carson awkwardly refused to take to their podiums until their names were called in the proper order.

From there the fireworks raged. Christie attacked Rubio’s Washington politics and attendance record, while Rubio pointed to Christie being shamed back to New Jersey after last month’s snowstorm. Jeb Bush accused Trump of using eminent domain to steal land from, “some poor old lady,” to rousing applause. Trump responded by insinuating that the audience was packed with RNC donors and special interests. Jeers and boos from the audience followed.

From the pure point of entertainment value, Republican debates are far better than Democratic debates. If watching a Dem debate is like watching your parents argue over custody of the party, then Republican debates are like watching your 7 drunk uncles argue over who’s the bigger badass. The posturing and jockeying for equal time turns every question into some kind of Lord of the Flies, seven-player tournament. It’s just too bad Carly Fiorina was left out due to an arbitrary picking process. Having her on the stage would’ve made the spectacle that much better.

The field is still wide open.

Trump and Cruz stayed under the radar and did very little to help or hurt their poll numbers. Rubio, coming off his strong showing in Iowa, lost ground with his broken record remarks. Christie rightly pounced and scored some points, but failed to make the case for his candidacy to the establishment. Ben Carson looked dead in the water, said little, and remains on life support. Jeb Bush isn’t far behind Ben Carson. If there is one dark horse in this race, it’s John Kasich. A strong showing in the Granite State could propel him forward and make him a contender.

If anyone will emerge as a viable challenge to Trump is still a question that hangs in the air and desperately needs an answer.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Election2016 and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to A Moderate View of the Republican Debate

  1. waynekelley2 says:

    I can understand what your views are against the republicans. I’m a libertarian myself, and it would be nice to see a libertarian in the debates but we know the corporate paid mass media will never let that happen. I did have one objection to you blog, you stated that “The newest jobs numbers released Friday show unemployment sinking to its lowest numbers since 2008” (par. 5). This may be true but the reasons for this drop in numbers is not because more people have jobs, it’s because more people have stopped looking for work. You talk of loosing touch with reality, how can we as Americans trust any of these politicians, and media poles if they only present part of their findings publicly, with out pointing out what I have stated above. A majority of Americans don’t know that they only count unemployment of people who are actively looking for jobs. I believe there is a great disconnect from populous to leadership due to the partial information that they release. Feel free to check out a blog that I am building here, waynekelley2.weebly.com/liberty-voice.

    Liked by 1 person

    • jlhugar says:

      That’s a great point. Thank you for bringing that to my attention. My point was more about perceptions, which is the issue you’re raising, so I think we do agree on that. If the perception being sold by the media is that the economy is getting better, then does it serve Republicans to state the opposite?

      Would it maybe be better for them to say, “We see small improvements in the conomy, but here’s the real problem. We need more participation from disaffected workers. Here’s how we’re going to fix it.”

      Like

      • waynekelley2 says:

        I feel that the American people as a whole are getting into this strange state of distrust with the government, both local and larger. I think we just need some truth, though some people probably would stress out abit, at least we would have aligning views from the government to the professionals that are stating the opposite on the economy. This goes for a lot of other issues as well. I just think that we are getting half truths, and that the people want the whole truth. That could help to explain why Trump is doing so well, because whether you like him or not, at least he’s telling you how he really sees the issues.

        Liked by 1 person

      • jlhugar says:

        I think Trump is speaking in a way that he knows will fire up the people who are in the “state of distrust” you’re describing. Whether or not it’s appropriate to play off the fears and anxieties of the citizenry is another thing. I think what he does is irresponsible and not good for the country if we really do want to end the gridlock in Congress.

        The reason we get what you call “half truths” is due to the fact that issues and economics can be spun either way. Every side wants to put out the numbers that suit their narrative. As citizens, it’s our responsibility to look at the numbers ourselves, draw conclusions, and debate on the best way forward.

        Like

  2. Pingback: A Moderate View of the Republican Debate | Donald Trump News

Comments

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s